Showing posts with label edit. Show all posts
Showing posts with label edit. Show all posts
27 September 2012
MSNBC - Another Scandal - Deceptive Tape Edit?
Good Grief! When will they ever learn? MSNBC sure seems to be following in the footsteps of its Big Brother, NBC. It appears the Romney tape they played for Morning Joe was mis-labeled, perhaps in a deliberately deceptive manner. Romney supporters who were at the campaign event disputed the appearently edited version of the tape alerting the BlazeTV staff. Judge for yourself over at the Blaze, where they provide the original and then the C-Span version. MSNBC Scandals and Follies
03 April 2012
WAPO Nails it, NBC Tape Edit Distortion Apology Absolution
Goodness, NBC investigation completed, and, guess what, half an apology ensues. See it here: NBC Apologizes (kind of) for deliberate tape distortion
Hey, newspeople, the first lesson you should have learned about reporting are the 5 W's: Who, What, Where, When, and WHY! So how does your investigation reporting fulfill the basic requirements of journalism?
Who? Fail! Not even a job title.
What? "production process error" Nope, too vague.
Where? Not even a continent named.
When? Sometime in the production process, between getting the tape and airing it.
Why? No explanation at all.
When will they ever learn?
Someone, a person, or human being, edited the tape, or was directed to edit the tape by someone, a human being, and specifically edited out portions of the sound track, in a studio located possibly located in an NBC production office, before the program lineup review by the production staff, most likely either to reinforce an editorial position of the production staff, or simply to titillate viewers and drive ratings. Of course, I am just guessing, based on just a bit of knowledge and experience in the broadcast industry, working for a reputable group.
A sad day indeed, to consider the present state of this once great broadcast media. I wonder what David Sarnoff would say today.
He did formulate Sarnoff's Law - which states that the value of a broadcast network is proportional to the number of viewers. And he did say that "Competition brings out the best in products and the worst in people". But he also demanded truth and accuracy in the news, tolerated no overt or covert agenda in broadcast journalism on his network, then delivered the best news broadcast of the day.
I guess there is a reason many of us fondly recall the golden years of Television.
Hey, newspeople, the first lesson you should have learned about reporting are the 5 W's: Who, What, Where, When, and WHY! So how does your investigation reporting fulfill the basic requirements of journalism?
Who? Fail! Not even a job title.
What? "production process error" Nope, too vague.
Where? Not even a continent named.
When? Sometime in the production process, between getting the tape and airing it.
Why? No explanation at all.
When will they ever learn?
Someone, a person, or human being, edited the tape, or was directed to edit the tape by someone, a human being, and specifically edited out portions of the sound track, in a studio located possibly located in an NBC production office, before the program lineup review by the production staff, most likely either to reinforce an editorial position of the production staff, or simply to titillate viewers and drive ratings. Of course, I am just guessing, based on just a bit of knowledge and experience in the broadcast industry, working for a reputable group.
A sad day indeed, to consider the present state of this once great broadcast media. I wonder what David Sarnoff would say today.
I guess there is a reason many of us fondly recall the golden years of Television.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)